«

»

Dec 08

18th Issue New Voice For Politics

18th Issue New Voice For Politics

 

In this Issue

A Living Tax A Living Wage is useless without a Living Tax.

You Cannot Afford to Be Stupid Those who do not pay attention end up paying more money.

 

hands out of my pockets

A Living Tax

Andrew Genesius

Most people do not have a problem with their employers giving them money. In fact, there have been very few complaints by employees about receiving money every paycheck. There are of course those who are dissatisfied with the amount they are paid, but they usually end up leaving their current job for a company that pays them a more satisfying figure. People may dislike the amount they are paid, but most employees enjoy the bargain of being paid for their work.

What has near universal hatred is the arrangement between citizens and their government. Every paycheck, the government takes money out of a person’s paycheck. It does not matter whether or not the government has provided a useful service to that individual, money is always seized from the person’s paycheck. The government does not care about a person’s preference for using their money for food, instead of starving. The government may claim to help, but most people only see the government claiming their money.

Many people receive a good amount of money from their employer, but then the government takes away so much, a person is unable to pay all their bills. If only the government was not so greedy. If only the government cared about the poor.

The time for change has come. No more can people tolerate the plundering of their paychecks by pilfering politicians. It is time for a living tax. People should not have to pay more than 15% of their income to the government. Local, state, and federal taxes should never be allowed to seize more than 15% of a person’s paycheck. If people were allowed to keep 85% of their paycheck, they would not have to live lives of despair and desperation. Politicians need to stop taking from those in need. We are only asking for a just tax system. Those who believe in social justice should support a living tax of 15%.

Some have argued for a living wage to help those in need, but a living wage will not help those in need if the government does not have a living tax. A mandatory increase in what companies have to pay their workers will not help the workers, because the government will also increase what it takes from workers. Workers do not need to take more away from corporations; they need the government to take less from them.

A few might complain that the government will not be able to do as much with less money, but is this necessarily a bad thing. If the government cannot live within it means, maybe it should cut its spending and learn to live on a budget. After all, does it make more sense for a single mother to go without or the government?

No one has a problem with big corporations providing their workers with money. We all have a problem with big government taking our money. Politicians need to be brave and speak up for the individual’s right to keep the money they have earned. They need to fight for people to have the ability to use their money to feed their family and pay for their housing. It is time for a living tax.

 

dare to be stupid

You Cannot Afford to be Stupid

Mary Crawford

Many people do not care about economics. They would rather watch paint dry then a report on the state of the economy. Sure business news channels will say people need to be informed about economic issues, but is ignorance of the inner workings of the economy really such a bad thing? After all, most people are able to drive to work every day without any knowledge of how their car actually works? What difference does it make if a person does not understand how an economy operates?

For many people, ignorance is not a problem, because they can rely on experts to fix their problems. Plumbers, carpenters, and electricians allow a home owner to outsource repairs to their house, which saves time and frustration. This of course only works as long as one is able to trust their expert. Things can go horribly wrong when experts cannot be trusted. Outsourcing haircare to a bad beautician can result in humiliation and the purchasing of hats. The results can be even worse, when the situation has a broader impact.

Recently, the healthcare industry has gone through a rough patch with the Affordable Care Act. The American people were promised they could keep their doctor, their insurance rates would not increase, this huge new government program would not increase the federal debt, and if they liked their insurance plan, they could keep it. All of these promises have been broken. How could this have happened? How could the American voters been hoodwinked?

Jonathan Gruber, one of the primary writers of the Affordable Care Act, has eloquently described exactly how the Affordable Care Act was passed: “Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically, that was really, really critical to get this thing to pass.” Moving beyond the fact that Mr. Gruber is a condescending elitist ass, he does raise an interesting point: horrible economic policies are passed into law when they are not recognized as horrible policies.

People make bad decisions when they lack key information. Most people would not have dated their x-boyfriend if they knew at the beginning what a jerk he actually was. A little knowledge at the beginning of the relationship would have avoided a horrible relationship and heartache. The same thing goes for the Affordable Care Act; if people had a better understanding of economics, it never would have passed.

Mr. Gruber pointed out the Affordable Care Act “was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO (Congressional Budget Office) did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes the bill dies.” Mr. Gruber understood “if you had a law which … made explicit [that] healthy people pay in and sick people get money, it would not have passed.” The only way it could be passed would be to deceive the American public by calling the tax something else and hoping no one noticed. Since not enough Americans were familiar with economics to see the bill for what it was, the bill passed.

Mr. Gruber asserts that the Affordable Care Act was enacted, because the American people are stupid; however, his claim of stupidity, like his claim of affordability for his bill, is not 100% accurate. It was not a lack of intelligence, but an absence of interest that allowed this monstrosity to become law. As a result of their apathy, Americans will now be forced to pony up more for insurance. People need to realize that there is a cost to not attending to economics. Those who do not pay attention end up paying more money.

 

If you wish to spread the joy and knowledge of New Voice For Politics, please share this article, encourage your friends to like the Facebook page, or add their email to the subscriber list for this free newsletter.

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>